Peer Review – Annotated Bib and Process Log Name First Last Your peer partner's nameThe BasicsDid your partner’s annotated bib and process log meet requirements? Go through this check list to let them know. Please check all that apply. The annotated bibliography contains 5 sources. Each source is a SCHOLARLY source (i.e. not a newspaper article, blog post, website, etc.) Each annotation contains a correctly formatted citation (MLA, APA, or Chicago formatting is OK.) Each annotation is between 150-250 words, not including the citation itself. Each annotation contains a summary that is not too close to the original text. Each annotation contains a specific connection to the research question There is a process log, and it is at least 500 words long. If you did not check a box above, please explain why not:SourcesUse this part of the form to reflect on the sources that your partner selected. Look at each abstract for each source that your partner found. Compare the abstract to your partner's summaries in their annotations. Are there any annotations that are too closely copying the original text?Discuss why each of the sources included on this list are scholarly. You don't have to discuss each source individually if there are multiple sources that fall into the same category (i.e. multiple journal articles.)Who is the audience that you think your partner might be talking to? Who might be interested in this research?Describe the connections that your partner is making between each of their sources and their research question.Please check all that apply. Each citation on the list contains: All of the necessary components for the type of citation (journal article, book, etc.) A hanging indent Double spacing No bold or underlined portions of the citations No bullet points If you did not check a box above, please explain why not:The Process Log and "Next Steps" ReflectionUse this part of the form to reflect on your partner’s process log and “next steps” reflection. Open a new window, and look back at the prompt for this assignment (link is below, but please note that if you open it in this same window, your progress will not be saved.) Does your partner answer the questions in the Process Log and Next Steps Reflection portion of the prompt?https://badideas15.commons.gc.cuny.edu/annotated-bibliography-and-process-log/Are there any places in the Process Log and Next Steps Reflection portion of this draft that left you confused?Are there any places in the Process Log and Next Steps Reflection that your partner could expand?What was similar or different about your partner's approach to completing the Annotated Bibliography and your own approach to it?General StuffThis is the last bit of the form! What is something that you learned from reading your partner's draft? It could be about the draft itself, or about the topic.What is something that you want to know more about after reading your partner's draft?Anything else you would like for your partner to know? Δ
